The Diamond Market Explorer
One machine ran the diamond business for a century: control supply, manufacture desire, keep the returns. This explorer traces how that machine was dismantled — and where the market, the price, and demand go from here. Five lenses, 1888 to 2035.
The whole story, in one place
The natural-diamond market is mid-transition: from a single-firm cartel that engineered scarcity and desire, to a competitive market where supply is fragmenting into government hands and an unlimited substitute sets the floor. These are the numbers that define it.
Choose a lens
An animated 1888–2035 timeline: De Beers' grip, sovereign share, rough price and supply, lab-grown's rise, and 26 events that moved the structure.
Every mine ever dug, by controlling company — then a forward model where the price is solved from supply vs. demand, mine by mine.
Two demand worlds: natural-diamond jewellery (by segment, geography and occasion) and synthetic-diamond value across all applications.
The four worlds for natural diamonds — and the central question: could an alliance of governments rebuild the old model? Test it.
Reconciled headline figures & sources
Primary references: De Beers Diamond Insight Reports 2014–2023; Bain & Company Global Diamond Industry / Report 2011, 2018, 2019, 2021–22 — all public, cross-referenced June 2026.
| Figure | Value | Source |
|---|---|---|
| De Beers share of world rough | ~85–90% (1980s) → 29.5% (2019) → ~30% (2024) | De Beers / Paul Zimnisky |
| World rough production | ~177 Mct (2005) → ~118–120 Mct (2024) | USGS MCS; Kimberley Process |
| Lab-grown, US engagement rings | 12% (2019) → 46% (2023) → 52% (2024) | The Knot / IDEX |
| Lab-grown wholesale price | down ~85–90% in a decade | Edahn Golan; Bain–AWDC |
| Category marketing | ~$200M De Beers peak (~$360M real) → NDC ~$36M (2024), ~$22M (2025) | JCK; The Diamond Press |
| De Beers divestment | Anglo American exiting; Botswana & Angola bidding; in process mid-2026 | Miningmx; National Jeweler |
Sources & assumptions
Where the margin sits across the chain
Four worlds for natural diamonds at 2030
Once the lab-grown battle is settled, a deeper question remains: do enough people still desire a culturally relevant product to sustain the sector? Two axes — whether the category grows (the war) and whether it converges to a coloured-gemstone structure (the battle) — give four futures.
Category marketing works and new markets open. Naturals claw back ground and create fresh demand pools. The full chain prospers.
New high-end markets open, but only at the very top. The structure converges to coloured-gemstone — yet premium demand absorbs enough volume.
Branding slows the decline but never drives growth. Permanently smaller — but stable. The classic muddle-through.
Marketing failed, no new markets opened. Naturals contract into a top-heavy, expertise-driven niche. The full price is paid.
Could an alliance of governments rebuild the old model?
As Anglo American exits De Beers — Botswana seeking majority control, Angola a further stake — the producing assets are consolidating into government hands. So the natural thought experiment: if supply becomes fully government-controlled, could a coalition of producer states become the new De Beers? It depends entirely on which levers the alliance will pull. Test each version.
A marketing-only alliance already exists — roughly the Natural Diamond Council — and it is demonstrably not enough. A pricing-and-supply alliance would come closer to old De Beers, but it hits a wall the original never faced: it can ration its own rough, not the substitute. Hold the natural price up and the contested volume simply flows to lab-grown. The cartel lever still exists — it just no longer reaches the whole market.
Supply went sovereign
De Beers' grip fell ~90% → ~30%; the single channel ended ~2000. The biggest producers are now states or state JVs. No one can withhold to defend price.
An unlimited substitute
Lab-grown can be made at scale by anyone; prices fell ~85–90%. You cannot engineer scarcity against a physically identical product with near-infinite supply. The industry's own reference reports under-called it — Bain (2019) forecast lab-grown at 5–15% of value by 2030; it reached ~52% of US engagement rings by 2024.
Demand became a free-rider
With supply split among rivals, no producer captures enough return on category marketing to fund it. Spend collapsed from ~$200M to a fraction.
A competitive market is still worth winning
The era of control is over and no realistic alliance fully rebuilds it. But competition is not decline — it's a different game, played on what a lab cannot replicate: real rarity, genuine provenance, cultural meaning. The old model defended a price; the new opportunity is to earn one.
Read the full scenario essay: The Natural Diamond Market at 2030 →
The four worlds and the alliance comparison are an analytical planning frame, not predictions; underlying figures are the reconciled set in the Overview. A scenario explorer, not a forecast.
Stay in touch — and work with me
If this was useful, leave your details and I'll keep you posted as the analysis develops. If you're after specific consulting or advisory on the diamond market — strategy, scenario modelling, or a bespoke version of this explorer built on your own data — tell me below or email me directly.
Prefer email? Write to ryan@perrycorp.org.
Your details go only to Ryan Perry / Perry Corp, are used solely to respond to your enquiry, and are never sold or shared. Email to request deletion at any time.