The Delivery Imperative
in the Era of Longer Holds

Why private equity must learn to recruit, recognise and unleash the proven execution talent hiding inside public companies.

In business, strategy is often commoditised; delivery is not. Private equity firms have long been caricatured as quick-flip artists working a compressed three-to-five year clock. That era is over. PE firms are now long-term stewards of businesses, and an increasing share of returns must come from cash generated and operational value built during the hold — not from exit multiples alone.

This structural shift is heating up the war for exceptional execution talent. The talent pool with these proven attributes exists, in volume, inside public limited companies and large corporates. Yet PE has historically been reluctant to hire broadly from those ranks, citing bureaucracy tolerance and pace. Firms that overcome the hesitation stand to capture a significant prize.

The data tells the story already in motion. The typical company in a GP's portfolio is now held for an average of more than 6.5 years — and 52% of the global buyout-backed inventory has sat on the books for four years or longer. Exit timelines have stretched to roughly seven years. Entry multiples sit at 11.8× EBITDA. Borrowing costs are in the 8–9% range.

Exhibit

The hold has stretched by a third

Average global PE portfolio holding period, years to exit

5.05.56.06.57.0201020142018202220252011–2020 average · 6.15.1 yrs2010 baseline6.6 yrs2025 · record high
Source: McKinsey Global Private Markets Report 2026; PitchBook. 2025 figure: 6.6 yrs.

The old playbook of financial engineering now accounts for far less of returns. Bain's 2026 report captures the new math with a phrase that has spread quickly through the industry: "12 is the new 5." Today's deals require approximately 10–12% annual EBITDA growth to hit a target 2.5× MOIC — versus the ~5% that delivered the same result during PE's golden decade.

Exhibit

12 is the new 5

Where the 2.5× MOIC came from over a five-year hold, then vs now

0%25%50%75%100%38%21%41%The 2010s5% annual EBITDA growth → 2.5× MOIC, 20% IRR21%75%Today10–12% annual EBITDA growth needed for the same 2.5× MOICMultipleLeverageEBITDA
Source: Bain Global Private Equity Report 2026. Segment splits are illustrative of the cited shift in return drivers.
In the new era we are entering, the performance that winning firms need to deliver will rely on their ability to rapidly generate strong EBITDA growth, full stop.
— Bain & Company, Global Private Equity Report 2026

The backlog is real, and it is growing. Roughly 32,000 unsold PE-owned companies sit on books worth some $3.8 trillion. Continuation vehicles — once a niche solution — now absorb 14% of exits and are on a trajectory toward something approaching 29% of exits within five years. Continuation funds reinforce rather than relieve the pressure: they extend the runway for value creation and cash extraction, which is precisely the runway that demands sustained operational delivery.

Exhibit

A swelling unsold backlog

PE-backed companies on the books (thousands), and share held 4+ years

0k10k20k30k0%20%40%60%201920202021202220232024202516k+ aged52% of inventoryTotal inventoryHeld 4+ yearsAged share
Source: McKinsey GPMR 2026 — 32,000 unsold companies; 16,000+ (52%) held 4+ years in 2025.
Exhibit

The continuation wedge

Share of PE exit value via continuation vehicles, % (projection in dashed)

0%10%20%30%2020202220242025202620282030202514% of exits~29%projected, 2030
Source: McKinsey & Jefferies secondary-market reviews. 2025: ~14% of exits. Industry projections imply ~29% by 2030.

This explains PE's caution around corporate talent — and the opportunity. Sophisticated firms have doubled the size of their operating groups since 2021, and value-creation strategy now ranks among the top criteria LPs use to select funds. Yet many GPs still default to PE-experienced or entrepreneurial profiles, fearing that corporate-honed executives may struggle with the owner mindset and speed required.

The best corporate executors, however, already operate with PE-like intensity. They are the hidden delivery stars PLC CEOs lean on — and they represent the large prize for PE firms that learn to identify and integrate them.

Exhibit

PE operating groups have ~doubled

Indexed headcount of in-house operating teams at top GPs (2021 = 1.0)

0.0×1.0×2.0×1.00×20212.05×2025
Source: Industry surveys cited in Bain GPER 2026. Indicative — top quartile of GPs by AUM.

The high performers share four interlocking attributes that transcend environment — and which become dramatically more valuable in a longer-hold PE world. When references and structured interviews surface all four, the candidate almost always thrives across the transition.

01

Moving forward despite ambiguity

Top executors refuse analysis paralysis. They build strategic clarity from incomplete data, run rapid experiments, and keep the pace high when consensus would stall. In a seven-year hold, external shocks are inevitable; this trait is what prevents drift.

Evidence test Look for: shipped decisions made with <60% information, on the record.
02
budget

Treating budgets as the floor — not the ceiling

Corporate planning rewards hitting the number. PE-grade executors instinctively contrast the momentum case against the full-potential case, probing every lever of revenue, margin and cash before accepting plan.

Evidence test Look for: a personal track record of outcomes ≥110% of the original mandate.
03

Ruthless prioritization and reallocation

They shift work to top performers, cull low-value activity and clean-sheet organizations. With labour 40–80% of cost in most portfolio companies, the operator who reallocates talent like capital is the operator who delivers the EBITDA growth the deal math now requires.

Evidence test Look for: documented cases of headcount, spend or initiative-list cuts >25%.
04

Ownership culture across silos

Influence in a large corporate is earned, not assigned. The best executors build it by consistently delivering — and propagate cultures where teams pair high standards with psychological safety. This is gold in smaller, higher-scrutiny PE portfolio teams.

Evidence test Look for: 360-feedback patterns where peers in other functions volunteer them for work.

Having spent more than twenty years in large corporate environments, I experienced firsthand the structural headwinds that make delivery far harder than it needs to be. The contrast after moving into PE-backed environments has been striking. The mindset adjustment is real, but the foundational capability is already there — PE simply removes the friction that previously held it back.

Dimension
PLC / Large corporate
PE-backed
Expectations
Often unclear or shifting across cycles and stakeholders.
Crystal clear and tied directly to value creation.
Incentives
Blunt or misaligned — reward activity over outcomes.
Uncomfortable in the best sense: strong upside for outperformance, real consequences for shortfall.
Decision-making
Multi-month cycles, committee-heavy, functionally-led.
Rapid. High performers given genuine freedom to deliver, without layers of approval.
Stakeholders
Diverse — analysts, regulators, employees, governments — often pulling against each other.
Concentrated and aligned. One scoreboard.
Time horizon
Quarterly drumbeat absorbs energy; long-cycle bets are politically expensive.
Six- to ten-year horizon for the asset; quarterly only to track the plan.
Mindset
Manage process, mitigate risk, maintain consensus.
Drive results, own the outcome, full-potential thinking.

Not everyone adapts. The cultural shift — from consensus and risk mitigation to speed, ownership and full-potential thinking — can feel abrupt. Yet the executives who have already demonstrated the ability to deliver despite the corporate constraints are often best positioned to thrive.

For PE firms

Hunt the hidden delivery stars deliberately.

  1. 01

    Rewrite the screen.

    Probe references and situational interviews for hard evidence of pushing past ambiguity, exceeding budget through ingenuity, and driving change in resistant environments. Generic "high-performer" signals are not enough.

  2. 02

    Use structured assessment.

    Owner-mindset and full-potential thinking are observable. Build cases that force the four attributes to either show up or not — and accept the verdict.

  3. 03

    Engineer the onboarding.

    The first 90 days are the cultural acid test. Remove the friction deliberately, set unambiguous full-potential targets, and protect the new operator from the consensus instincts they carried in.

For PLC executives

Make the muscle visible — before you need it.

  1. 01

    Take the ambiguous brief.

    Volunteer for the high-ambiguity, full-potential initiative nobody else wants. The conviction-under-fog moments are the ones that translate.

  2. 02

    Track personal delivery metrics.

    Outcomes above 110% of the original mandate. Headcount and spend reallocations of >25%. Decisions made publicly with incomplete data. Build the dossier as you go.

  3. 03

    Reject the budget ceiling, on record.

    The single strongest signal is a documented full-potential plan you proposed and then delivered against — separate from, and beyond, what the corporate planning process asked for.

Value creation has always hinged less on grand strategy than on disciplined execution. Longer holding periods and the shift to operational cash generation have simply raised the stakes.

PLCs offer scale and resources but risk diffusion. Modern PE demands intensity and ownership over extended timelines, but rewards those who deliver relentlessly. The executives who thrive across both worlds are those who treat delivery as a personal imperative — moving decisively despite ambiguity, rejecting incrementalism for full potential, and building accountable cultures.

By identifying, empowering, and emulating these high performers, PE firms can turn the corporate talent paradox into their greatest competitive advantage. In an era of elevated multiples, longer holds, and rising LP expectations, this delivery mindset is not optional. It is the edge that separates survivors from leaders.

Scroll to Top